I was going through boxes of old
magazines and scrapbooks in the basement of my parent’s house, sorting and
sifting through parts of their past, when I first came across a peculiar little
article. More specifically, it was a short, untitled sidebar piece clipped out
of a magazine and taped to a sheet of heavy paper. From the masthead I saw that
it was from the August 16, 1964, issue of Newsweek
magazine.
A list of curious coincidences on the
assassinations of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy was making the
office duplicating machines hum in New York last week. Under the title ‘Strange
as It Sounds,’ the synchronism read:
-
Both
Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy were concerned with the issue of civil rights.
-
Lincoln
was elected in 1860, Kennedy in 1960.
-
Both
Presidents were assassinated on a Friday and both in the presence of their
wives.
-
Both
Presidents were shot from behind and in the head.
-
Their
successors, both named Johnson, were Southern Democrats and both were in the
Senate.
-
Andrew
Johnson was born in 1808 and Lyndon Johnson was born in 1908.
-
John
Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald were Southerners favoring unpopular ideas.
-
Booth
and Oswald were both assassinated before it was possible for either of them to
be brought to trial.
-
Both
Presidents’ wives lost children through death while living in the White House.
-
John
Wilkes Booth shot Lincoln in a theater box and afterward ran to a warehouse.
-
Oswald
shot Kennedy from a warehouse and ran to a theater.
-
The
last names of both Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.
-
The
names of Andrew Johnson and Lyndon Johnson each contain thirteen letters.
-
The
names of both John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald each contain fifteen
letters.
-
Lincoln’s
secretary, whose name was Kennedy, advised him not to go to the theater.
-
Kennedy’s
secretary, whose name was Lincoln, advised him not to go to Dallas.
-
Coming less than a year
after the national trauma of Kennedy’s murder in Dallas, one can imagine the
goosebumps and raised eyebrows when readers took all that in back in 1964. (Like
my father, who obviously thought enough of this corollary list to clip it out
and set it aside.)
Well I too was intrigued.
So I decided to do a little research on the subject myself. A couple of taps
and clicks on the computer and I found out that this same comparison of the
assassinations of Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy has been circulating for
years. But alas, a little fact-checking by historians and pseudo-scholars alike
uncovered a few problems.
For starters, the ‘author’
behind these comparisons has never been established. Usually not a good sign.
Secondly, while President
Kennedy did indeed have a personal secretary named Evelyn Lincoln, there is no
record of President Lincoln ever having a secretary or staff member named
Kennedy. Whoever thought that one up was good. Real good.
Too bad it never
happened.
Which begs the question –
what is the veracity and the meaning of the rest of the list?
Anyone with the vaguest
notion of American history knows the common fate of these two celebrated
figures. Since the other oddities on that list do hold up under historical
scrutiny, the overall effect is enough to make one think twice about dismissing
outright those funny little things called chance and destiny. That’s a good
thing to ponder.
But there’s another note
to be found here, a cautionary one. The line between fact and entertaining
fiction can be a fine one, easily and discreetly crossed by anyone these days.
If there’s one thing history and media and politics has taught us over the
years, it’s that a little stretching of the truth goes a long way in getting and
directing people’s attention. For better and for worse
Urban myth and folklore
has always been part of our entertainment culture. Nowadays that story culture
is being stretched like never before with blogs and websites of every ilk. There
is fake news and “data dredging,” whereby vast amounts of data are
mixed and matched until they seem to present fact and identity where none exists
at all.
So consider this a friendly reminder, dear reader, that everything you see in
black and white isn’t always as simple and straightforward as, well, black and
white. Take it from Newsweek in 1964.
Or better yet, take it from
Lincoln himself, who purportedly once said: “You can fool all
the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot
fool all the people all of the time.”
That one I'd like to believe. I really would.
No comments:
Post a Comment